<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ink19.com/truthtopower/archives/5677/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ink19.com/truthtopower/archives/5677</link>
	<description>America is at that awkward stage: It's too late to work within the system, but too soon to shoot the bastards: Claire Wolfe</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Sweet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ink19.com/truthtopower/archives/5677#comment-8968</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Sweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ink19.com/truthtopower/archives/005677#comment-8968</guid>
		<description>" as much as HRC and McCain..." The more you say that, the more likely "Obama and McCain..." is less prone to happen...


Meanwhile...   Dave Kopel compares Hillary and Obama on gun control. "Imagine an election race of Pat Robertson versus James Dobson, each of them appearing at organic grocery stores and Starbucks throughout Massachusetts, with each candidate insisting that he alone deserves the vote of gay-marriage advocates. . . . A presidential candidate could of course swear devotion to the First Amendment, while declaring that the amendment's purpose is to protect sports reporting and book collecting. And that candidate could still support government lawsuits against publishers, local bans on newspapers, and draconian restrictions on political commentary."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; as much as HRC and McCain&#8230;&#8221; The more you say that, the more likely &#8220;Obama and McCain&#8230;&#8221; is less prone to happen&#8230;</p>
<p>Meanwhile&#8230;   Dave Kopel compares Hillary and Obama on gun control. &#8220;Imagine an election race of Pat Robertson versus James Dobson, each of them appearing at organic grocery stores and Starbucks throughout Massachusetts, with each candidate insisting that he alone deserves the vote of gay-marriage advocates. . . . A presidential candidate could of course swear devotion to the First Amendment, while declaring that the amendment&#8217;s purpose is to protect sports reporting and book collecting. And that candidate could still support government lawsuits against publishers, local bans on newspapers, and draconian restrictions on political commentary.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
